You can upload reports from distributors, publishers, PROs, CMOs, neighboring-rights societies, social platforms, sync partners, and direct royalty sources. CSV and Excel usually provide the most complete analysis; ZIP and readable PDF files are also supported.

Each source uses different column names, currencies, periods, and usage types. Luna X Royalties maps those fields into a consistent catalog view so songs, artists, platforms, territories, units, and revenue can be compared together.

No. The dashboard provides an indicative range based on recent royalty revenue and catalog performance. A formal valuation also requires rights verification, term, ownership, concentration, contractual restrictions, risk review, and professional diligence.

A catalog driven by one song, artist, platform, or territory may carry more risk than diversified income. The dashboard surfaces top-song, top-artist, source, and market concentration so you can understand what is carrying the catalog.

Yes. When the uploaded metadata identifies them, the panel ranks songs and artists by revenue and reported units, alongside platform, country, and monthly performance views.

The analysis reflects the information supplied by the source report. Review import warnings and totals before using results. Updated or corrected statements can be uploaded so the workspace can be refreshed with better data.

You can submit a catalog for a preliminary royalty advance, funding, or acquisition review. A request is not an offer or commitment; opportunities remain subject to ownership checks, underwriting, diligence, approvals, and separate agreements.

Your reports remain your data and are processed to provide the workspace. Access should be limited to authorized users. Our Privacy Policy explains processing, retention, service providers, international transfers, and your available rights.

No. Luna X Royalties is an independent catalog analytics workspace that sits on top of the royalty sources you already use. Distribution services are available separately through Orbit Elements, while your existing distributor, publisher, and society relationships can remain unchanged.

No. A single release, emerging artist, label roster, publishing catalog, or established rights portfolio can all be reviewed. The depth of the analysis depends on the history and detail available in the reports you provide.

Yes. Historical statements can help show lifetime revenue, reporting continuity, catalog stability, and how earnings change as releases age. Results are limited to the periods and sources represented in the uploaded files.

The workspace can combine master recording, publishing, performance, mechanical, neighboring-rights, sync, social, UGC, and direct-platform income when those sources provide compatible reports.

It can surface gaps, unusual changes, missing periods, inconsistent metadata, and concentration patterns for review. These are investigative signals, not proof that money is owed. Confirm suspected issues with the relevant distributor, publisher, society, administrator, or professional adviser.